Economy






Berks County appears to be recovering from the national recession of 2008-09, with an unemployment rate and an employment-to-population ratio that are slightly outperforming Pennsylvania and nation. However, there also are a few warning signs, including an average salary increase that is smaller than both the state and national level, and relatively high spending by county government and schools.  

Unemployment rates are a timely indicator of changes in the local employment landscape. In 2016, Berks County’s unemployment rate was 5%, slightly lower than Pennsylvania and similar to the nation. This was down from a post-recession peak of 8.7% in 2010. However, the 2016 rate was 1.1 percentage points higher than in 2000.

The employment-to-population ratio also offers an indicator of the availability of work in a region. The ratio Berks was 78% in 2016, slightly higher than Pennsylvania and the nation. Between 2000 and 2016, the county’s ratio peaked at 80% in 2000 and dropped as low as 73% in 2009.

Changes in the size of the labor force indicate people’s willingness and ability to find work. From 2000 to 2016, Berks County’s labor force increased 10%, a larger increase than at the state level, but slightly less than at the national level.

Employment changes by sector paint a picture of the county’s changing economy. The total number of jobs in Berks County increased 8% from 2001 to 2015, but the Professional and Business Services sector grew 26% during this period, while Manufacturing jobs declined 20%. Trade, Transportation and Utilities was down slightly, by 3%.

The share of jobs by sector is a key indicator of the structure of the economy in a region. In 2015, Trade, Transportation and Utilities made up the largest sector in Berks, accounting for 19% of jobs. Professional and Business Services comprised 14% of jobs, a larger share than the state and even with the nation. Other key sectors were Manufacturing, 14%; Health Care and Social Assistance, 13%; and Government, 10%.

Average salaries also are a gauge of the degree to which employees are sharing in the prosperity of particular industries. In 2016, the three highest-paid sectors in Berks County were Financial Activities, with an average salary of $79,800, Construction, at $60,500, and Professional and Business Services, at $59,200.

Changes in salaries by sector offer a more detailed view of economic health in specific industries. Between 2000 and 2016, the average salary for Berks workers increased 7%, less than the state and nation. Most economic sectors in Berks had increases in average salaries during this period, but the extent varied widely, from a 54% increase in Financial Activities to a 22% decline in Educational Services.

Commuters entering and leaving a county is an indicator of its economic vitality and ability to draw employers and employees from surrounding areas. It may also reflect the quality of the match between the jobs available in an area and the skills of its resident workforce. In 2015, 42% of Berks County residents commuted outside the county for work, up 9 percentage points since 2002. Also in 2015, 35% of people who worked in Berks had traveled there from another county. The City of Reading, in contrast, had 81% of city residents commute out of the city, while 80% of the city’s workers commuted in from elsewhere.

Per capita income from governmental programs is one way to measure a region’s level of poverty. In 2015, Berks County received $2,670 in public assistance income per resident, less than Pennsylvania, but more than the nation. Between 2000 and 2015, public assistance per resident in Berks County increased 79% (after inflation), compared to 60% statewide and 66% nationally.

Local government spending per capita can indicate the level of services provided, as well as the cost of taxes, a potential hindrance to development. Local governments in Berks County spent $1,220 per resident in 2015, up 34% from 2000, but down from $1,480 in 2008. Local government spending was higher across Pennsylvania than in Berks.

County government spending is a similar indicator, but at the county level. Berks County government spent just under $940 per resident in 2015, down from $1,030 in 2000. County government spending across Pennsylvania has been consistently lower than Berks since 2000.

Spending of school districts show a community’s support for public education. Schools in Berks County spent $2,630 per resident in 2016, up 36% from $1,930 in 2001. Berks spent more per resident than Pennsylvania in 2016, and has spent more than the state each year since 2001. 





INDICATORS TREND | BERKS COUNTY
Early Prenatal Care Increasing
Early Prenatal Care by Mother's Race/Ethnicity Not Applicable
Children Living in Poverty Increasing
Children Living in Poverty, by Race/Ethnicity Not Applicable
Single-Parent Families Increasing
Single-Parent Families, by Race/Ethnicity Not Applicable
Disengaged Youth Maintaining
Live Births to Teen Mothers Decreasing
Change in Population by Age and Gender Not Applicable
Change in Total Population by Race/Ethnicity Not Applicable
Population by Age and Race/Ethnicity Not Applicable
Foreign-Born Population Increasing
Language Diversity Increasing
Unemployment Rate Increasing
Change in Labor Force Increasing
Employment to Population Ratio Decreasing
Change in Jobs by Sector Not Applicable
Sector Share of Total Jobs Not Applicable
Average Salary by Sector Not Applicable
Change in Average Salary by Sector Not Applicable
People Entering/Leaving Region for Work Not Applicable
Public Assistance Increasing
Local Government Spending Increasing
County Government Spending Decreasing
School District Spending Increasing
Quality Early Childhood Centers Increasing
Prekindergarten Participation Increasing
Students Eligible for Free/Reduced Price Lunch Increasing
English Language Learners Increasing
Students Receiving Special Education Services Increasing
Per Student Spending Increasing
Student Performance on Grade 3 English Not Applicable
Student Performance on Grade 3 Math Not Applicable
Student Performance on Grade 8 English Not Applicable
Student Performance on Grade 8 Math Not Applicable
Student Performance on High School Reading Increasing
Student Performance on High School Math Increasing
High School Cohort Graduation Rate Increasing
Plans of High School Graduates Not Applicable
Education Levels of Adults by Race/Ethnicity Not Applicable
Brain Drain/Gain Increasing
Median Household Income Decreasing
Median Household Income by Household Type Not Applicable
Living Wage by Household Type Not Applicable
People Living in Poverty Increasing
Working Poor Maintaining
People Receiving Federal Food Assistance Increasing
Health Status Decreasing
Managed Medicaid Enrollment Increasing
People Without Health Insurance Decreasing
Physically Inactive Adults Maintaining
Adults Who Are Overweight or Obese Not Applicable
Children Who Are Overweight or Obese Not Applicable
Youth Who Are Overweight or Obese Not Applicable
Occupied Housing Units Not Applicable
Homeownership Rates Decreasing
Housing Affordability for Homeowners Decreasing
Housing Affordability for Homeowners by Race/Ethnicity Not Applicable
Housing Affordability for Renters Increasing
Housing Affordability for Renters by Race/Ethnicity Not Applicable
Age of Housing Stock Not Applicable
Single-Family Home Sales Maintaining
Median Single-Family Home Sale Price Increasing
Tourism Spending Decreasing
Voter Registration Rate Increasing
Voter Participation Rate Increasing
Average Charitable Giving Increasing
Charitable Contributions as a Percentage of Income Increasing
Households With Internet Access Increasing
Dams Not Applicable
Violent Crimes Decreasing
Property Crimes Decreasing
Incarceration Rates Decreasing
Drug Abuse Offenses Increasing
Drug Abuse Arrests Increasing
Protection from Domestic Abuse Maintaining
Means of Transportation to Work Not Applicable
Average Travel Time to Work Increasing
Households Without Vehicles Decreasing
Crashes Involving Alcohol Decreasing